MEDICAL BLOG...FOR ALL PEOPLE>>TO BE HEALTHY

.. This blog contains medical information that is useful for all .. I hope you spend the happiest times. Ce blog contient des informations médicales qui est utile pour tous .. J'espère que tu passeras moments les plus heureux

ads

FDA Approves 'Son of Advair' for COPD Exacerbations

Thursday, May 16, 2013


The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave the marketing nod today to a novel once-daily inhaled therapy for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
The product is a combination of the synthetic inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) and the long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist vilanterol trifenatate (VI) that some have hailed as the "son of Advair" (fluticasone propionate and salmeterol; GlaxoSmithKline). GlaxoSmithKline and its partner Theravance have announced that the new product will be called Breo Ellipta in the United States and Relvar Ellipta in Europe.
In contrast to Advair Diskus, which is dosed twice daily, the new once-daily inhaler contains a different, reputedly more stable side-chain variant of fluticasone, with vilanterol in place of salmeterol. The drugs are delivered via a dry powder inhaler containing 2 blister strips, each containing 30 doses of fluticasone or vilanterol. The manufacturer claims the inhaler design provides "consistent dosing even in patients with severe lung function impairment."
On April 17, the Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee to the FDA voted 9 to 4 to recommend approval of FF/VI 100/25 μg as a once-daily inhaled treatment for reduction of COPD exacerbations, and 12 to 1 to support approval of the combination for the long-term maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction in COPD, the 2 indications GlaxoSmithKline sought for US approval.
Questions Still Exist
There is some question, however, about whether the improvements in airway obstruction seen in the manufacturer-conducted trials submitted for approval came from the corticosteroid or the long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist component of the combination. According to FDA's summary minutes of the April 17 panel meeting, one member said that "there were no statistically robust data to support the contribution of FF component to the combination in either lung function trial."
An investigator for 2 double-blinded group trials, however, tells Medscape Medical News that compared with vilanterol alone, FF/VI was associated with a decreased rate of moderate and severe exacerbations of COPD in patients with a history of exacerbations.
In addition, the once-daily dosing may help to improve compliance, said Nicola A. Hanania, MD, associate professor of medicine in the Section of Pulmonary Medicine and director of the Asthma/COPD Clinical Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas.
"Fluticasone furoate has been shown to have a longer effect than fluticasone propionate, even though both are fluticasone, and that's why they were able to show that it's a once-a-day drug," he said. "Vilanetrol, as well, has once-a-day activity compared to salmeterol, which is a very weak agonist."
In these 2 studies, investigators saw an increased risk for pneumonia among patients receiving the combination, and there were 8 pneumonia deaths among the 3255 patients enrolled in the trials. All of the deaths occurred in patients receiving various fluticasone/vilanterol combinations; none occurred in patients receiving vilanterol alone.
At the FDA panel hearing in April, some panel members noted that the inhaler did not appear to be associated with cardiovascular, potassium, or tremor safety signals and that adverse event testing appeared adequate.
However, there were also concerns about the increased risk for pneumonia, fracture, and ocular adverse events such as elevated intraocular pressure. Some of the 5 members who voted "no" on the question of adequate evidence for safety said the risks from the therapy might outweigh the benefits in patients with mild COPD.
The FDA does warn that Breo Ellipta may cause serious adverse effects, including increased risks for pneumonia and bone fractures. The most common adverse effects seen among patients using Breo Ellipta included nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and oral candidiasis.
The medication carries a boxed warning that long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists increase the risk for asthma-related death. The safety and efficacy of Breo Ellipta in patients with asthma have not been established, and it is not approved for the treatment of asthma, according to the FDA.
There is also a patient medication guide with instructions for use and information about the potential risks of taking the drug. Breo Ellipta should not be used as a rescue therapy to treat sudden breathing problems (acute bronchospasm) and is not recommended for people younger than 18 years.
The cost of the therapy was not known at this time, but given that it is a new drug formulation in a novel inhaler design, there is likely to be a price premium compared with other therapies, Dr. Hanania said.
"We've had quite a bit of advancement in COPD pharmacotherapy in the last 10 years, which is really good because there is an unmet need. But one of the problems is they are costly, and people who can't afford it go back to their regular rescue medications," he said.
More information is available on the FDA Web site.
The studies submitted to the FDA were funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Baylor College of Medicine has received research support from the company.
Neil Osterweil
DisclosuresMay 10, 2013

Feverish illness in children 2

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Patient-centred care

This guideline offers best practice advice on the care of children with feverish illness.
Treatment and care should take into account childrens' needs and preferences and those of their parents or carers. Parents and carers of children with fever should have the opportunity to make informed decisions about their care and treatment, in partnership with their healthcare professionals. If parents or carers do not have the capacity to make decisions, healthcare professionals should follow the Department of Health guidelines – 'Reference guide to consent for examination or treatment' (2001) (available from www.dh.gov.uk). Since April 2007, healthcare professionals need to follow a code of practice accompanying the Mental Capacity Act (summary available from www.dca.gov.uk/menincap/bill-summary.htm).
Good communication between healthcare professionals and the parents and carers of children with fever is essential. It should be supported by evidence-based written information. Treatment and care of children with fever, and the information parents and carers are given about it, should be culturally appropriate. It should also be accessible to people with additional needs such as physical, sensory or learning disabilities, and to people who do not speak or read English.
Parents and carers should have the opportunity to be involved in decisions about the patient's care and treatment.
Parents and carers should also be given the information and support they need.

Feverish illness in children

 

 Introduction

Feverish illness in young children usually indicates an underlying infection and is a cause of concern for parents and carers. Feverish illness is very common in young children, with between 20 and 40% of parents reporting such an illness each year. As a result, fever is probably the commonest reason for a child to be taken to the doctor. Feverish illness is also the second most common reason for a child being admitted to hospital. Despite advances in healthcare, infections remain the leading cause of death in children under the age of 5 years.
Fever in young children can be a diagnostic challenge for healthcare professionals because it is often difficult to identify the cause. In most cases, the illness is due to a self-limiting viral infection. However, fever may also be the presenting feature of serious bacterial infections such as meningitis or pneumonia. A significant number of children have no obvious cause of fever despite careful assessment. These children with fever without apparent source are of particular concern to healthcare professionals because it is especially difficult to distinguish between simple viral illnesses and life-threatening bacterial infections in this group.
Although there are guidelines for many individual infections, there is no national guidance on the management of fever as a presenting illness. Management varies across the UK and there is some evidence that mortality and morbidity from infectious diseases in children is sometimes associated with deficiencies in the healthcare system and in the diagnosis and treatment of illnesses. There is also some evidence that death rates are higher in the least affluent areas.
As a result, there is a perceived need to improve the recognition, assessment and immediate treatment of feverish illnesses in children. This guideline is designed to assist healthcare professionals in the initial assessment and immediate treatment of young children with fever presenting to primary or secondary care.

‪5 Steps to Chest X-ray Interpretation

Monday, October 24, 2011


I LOVE ISLAM

Thursday, October 20, 2011


Oxford Handbook of Respiratory Medicine


Oxford Handbook of Respiratory Medicine



http://amonshare.com/f10871fmh6sz/Ox...icine.pdf.html

نقرتين لعرض الصورة في صفحة مستقلة